Evaluation of upper airway characteristics in patients with and without sleep apnea using cone-beam computed tomography and computational fluid dynamics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if upper airway characteristics and airway pressure change significantly between low risk, healthy non-OSA subjects, and OSA subjects during respiration using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and steady-state k-ω model computational fluid dynamics (CFD) fluid flow simulations, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT scans were collected at both end-inhalation and end-exhalation for 16 low-risk non-OSA subjects and compared to existing CBCT data from 7 OSA subjects. The CBCT images were imported into Dolphin Imaging and the upper airway was segmented into stereolithography (STL) files for area and volumetric measurements. Subject models that met pre-processing criteria underwent CFD simulations using ANSYS Fluent Meshing (Canonsburg, PA) in which unstructured mesh models were generated to solve the standard dual equation turbulence model (k-ω). Objective and supplemental descriptive measures were obtained and statistical analyses were performed with both parametric and non-parametric tests to evaluate statistical significance at P < .05. RESULTS: Regarding area and volumetric assessments, there were statistically significant mean differences in Total Volume and Minimum CSA between non-OSA and OSA groups at inhalation and exhalation (P = .002, .003, .004, and .007), respectively. There were also statistically significant mean differences in volume and min CSA between the inhalation and exhalation for the non-OSA group (P < .001 and .002), respectively. CONCLUSION: While analysis of the CFD simulation was limited by the collected data available, a finding consistent with published literature was that the OSA subject group simulation models depicted the point of lowest pressure coinciding with the area of maximum constriction.

Changes in sleep and airway variables in patients with obstructive sleep apnea after mandibular advancement splint treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an extensive public health problem that imposes considerable morbidity. Mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy is a well tolerated treatment, but success rates are difficult to predict. Our objective was to investigate the relationship of oropharyngeal airway dimensions, sleep characteristics, patient biometrics, and treatment response within an OSA patient sample. METHODS: Records of 33 adults were assessed retrospectively with the use of Dolphin 3D and Image J to measure the airway on pretreatment supine cone-beam computed tomography images and derived lateral cephalograms. The patients used Somnodent (Somnomed; Crows Nest, Australia) MAS appliances, which were titrated over 6-8 weeks. Appliance titration measurements and pre- and posttreatment polysomnograms were assessed. Respiratory disturbance index (RDI), absolute and percentage changes in RDI, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) RDI, rapid eye movement (REM) RDI, supine and nonsupine NREM and REM RDI, and minimal blood-oxygen saturation variables were evaluated. The associations of measurements from 2D and 3D minimal anterior-posterior linear distance and 3D airway variables with MAS treatment response were estimated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Combined effects of baseline total airway volume, body mass index, neck circumference, location of minimal cross sectional area, and OSA severity were associated with treatment response. Patients with higher initial OSA and more superiorly located airway constriction showed enhanced treatment response to MAS therapy. Airway constriction due to maxillofacial disproportions rather than soft tissue obstruction also showed better treatment response. No significant relationships were found in lateral cephalogram measurements.

Computerized measurement of the location and value of the minimum sagittal linear dimension of the upper airway on reconstructed lateral cephalograms compared with 3-dimensional values.

INTRODUCTION: Identifying the location and value of the smallest airway dimension can be useful in screening and planning treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Our objectives in this study were to (1) objectively identify the vertical location and value of the minimum sagittal linear dimension (MSLD) on 2-dimensional reconstructed lateral cephalograms (RLCs), (2) compare the location and value of the MSLD on RLCs with the vertical location and sagittal dimension of the minimum cross-sectional area (MCSA), and (3) investigate the association between the MSLD on RLCs and both the MCSA and the airway volume. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 91 patients, in 3 age groups (<20, 20-40, and >40 years), were used to perform 3-dimensional assessments of the upper airway and reconstruct lateral cephalograms. Airway volume, MCSA, vertical level, and sagittal dimension of MCSA on the CBCT scans were obtained using Dolphin 3D software (version 11.7; Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, Calif). Customized software was used to objectively obtain the location and value of the MSLD of the airway on RLCs. RESULTS: In all age groups, correlation tests showed significant correlations between the MSLD on RLCs and both the MCSA (rs ≥0.59; P <0.001) and the airway volume (rs ≥0.37; P <0.05). Additionally, there were significant correlations between the vertical location of the MSLD and the vertical location of the MCSA (rs ≥0.41; P <0.05) and between the MSLD and the sagittal dimension of the MCSA (r ≥0.61; P <0.001). Bland-Altman plots for the MSLD and the sagittal dimension of the MCSA showed much narrower 95% limits of agreement compared with the Bland-Altman plots for the vertical locations of the MSLD and the MCSA. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional images may be used as a screening tool and to identify the sagittal dimension of the smallest airway dimension. However, comprehensive assessment of airway characteristics is better achieved with CBCT-based 3-dimensional evaluation.

Orthodontics and the temporomandibular joint: What orthodontic providers need to know.

Currently, there are three major groups of dentists who provide orthodontic services to the public: postgraduate trained orthodontists, postgraduate trained pediatric dentists, and general dentists who have taken various orthodontic training courses. All of them can expect to encounter a variety of clinical situations that require a proper understanding of how normal temporomandibular joints (TMJs) function, and also how the masticatory system can develop pain-dysfunction problems; those problems are classified and defined as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). In this paper, six "intersections" between these groups of practitioners and those clinical situations will be discussed, with an emphasis on practical approaches to managing problems that may arise during orthodontic treatment. Specific recommendations are offered to help clinicians recognize clinical problems and to deal with them successfully.

Change in the vertical dimension of Class II Division 1 patients after use of cervical or high-pull headgear.

INTRODUCTION: The goals of this study were to compare the effects that cervical and high-pull headgear have on the vertical dimensions in Class II Division 1 patients during phase 1 treatment and to compare these effects with untreated predicted growth for the sample population. METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric radiographs of children who had undergone Class II Division 1 correction with cervical (n = 22) or high-pull headgear (n = 19) were analyzed for the measurements that describe the changes in the vertical component of growth and mandibular position. The groups were matched for age (mean, 9 ± 2.5 years), treatment time (mean, 14 months), malocclusion, and similar skeletal features. The groups were compared with each other and also with an untreated growth model. RESULTS: Treatment with cervical headgear resulted in smaller increases in measurements that describe the vertical dimension than with high-pull headgear. Cervical headgear showed more favorable changes in mandibular growth that were statistically significant when compared with the untreated growth models. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the cervical headgear showed more control over the vertical dimension and produced more favorable changes in mandibular position by normalizing the occlusal plane. Compared with the untreated growth model, cervical headgear worked synergistically with growth to produce more optimal changes in mandibular position.

Bonding of Metal Orthodontic Attachments to Sandblasted Porcelain and Zirconia Surfaces.

This study evaluates tensile bond strength (TBS) of metal orthodontic attachments to sandblasted feldspathic porcelain and zirconia with various bonding protocols. Thirty-six (36) feldspathic and 36 zirconia disc samples were prepared, glazed, embedded in acrylic blocks and sandblasted, and divided into three groups according to one or more of the following treatments: hydrofluoric acid 4% (HF), Porcelain Conditioner silane primer, Reliance Assure® primer, Reliance Assure plus® primer, and Z Prime™ plus zirconia primer. A round traction hook was bonded to each sample. Static tensile bond strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scoring was done using a digital camera. One-way ANOVA and Pearson chi-square tests were used to analyze TBS (MPa) and ARI scores. No statistically significant mean differences were found in TBS among the different bonding protocols for feldspathic and zirconia, p values = 0.369 and 0.944, respectively. No statistically significant distribution of ARI scores was found among the levels of feldspathic, p value = 0.569. However, statistically significant distribution of ARI scores was found among the levels of zirconia, p value = 0.026. The study concluded that silanization following sandblasting resulted in tensile bond strengths comparable to other bonding protocols for feldspathic and zirconia surface.

Assessment of vertical changes during maxillary expansion using quad helix or bonded rapid maxillary expander.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a significantly different effect on vertical changes during phase I palatal expansion treatment using a quad helix and a bonded rapid maxillary expander in growing skeletal Class I and Class II patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study looked at 2 treatment groups, a quad helix group and a bonded rapid maxillary expander group, before treatment (T1) and at the completion of phase I treatment (T2). Each treatment group was compared to an untreated predicted growth model. Lateral cephalograms at T1 and T2 were traced and analyzed for changes in vertical dimension. RESULTS: No differences were found between the treatment groups at T1, but significant differences at T2 were found for convexity, lower facial height, total facial height, facial axis, and Frankfort Mandibular Plane Angle (FMA) variables. A comparison of treatment groups at T2 to their respective untreated predicted growth models found a significant difference for the lower facial height variable in the quad helix group and for the upper first molar to palatal plane (U6-PP) variable in the bonded expander group. CONCLUSION: Overall, both the quad helix expander and the bonded rapid maxillary expander showed minimal vertical changes during palatal expansion treatment. The differences at T2 suggested that the quad helix expander had more control over skeletal vertical measurements. When comparing treatment results to untreated predicted growth values, the quad helix expander appeared to better maintain lower facial height and the bonded rapid maxillary expander appeared to better maintain the maxillary first molar vertical height.

Comparison of the transformation temperatures of heat-activated Nickel-Titanium orthodontic archwires by two different techniques.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the suitability of the Bend and Free Recovery (BFR) method as a standard test method to determine the transformation temperatures of heat-activated Ni-Ti orthodontic archwires. This was done by determining the transformation temperatures of two brands of heat-activated Ni-Ti orthodontic archwires using the both the BFR method and the standard method of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The values obtained from the two methods were compared with each other and to the manufacturer-listed values. METHODS: Forty heat-activated Ni-Ti archwires from both Rocky Mountain Orthodontics (RMO) and Opal Orthodontics (Opal) were tested using BFR and DSC. Round (0.016 inches) and rectangular (0.019×0.025 inches) archwires from each manufacturer were tested. The austenite start temperatures (As) and austenite finish temperatures (Af) were recorded. RESULTS: For four of the eight test groups, the BFR method resulted in lower standard deviations than the DSC method, and, overall, the average standard deviation for BFR testing was slightly lower than for DSC testing. Statistically significant differences were seen between the transformation temperatures obtained from the BFR and DSC test methods. However, the Af temperatures obtained from the two methods were remarkably similar with the mean differences ranging from 0.0 to 2.1°C: Af Opal round (BFR 26.7°C, DSC 27.6°C) and rectangular (BFR 27.6°C, DSC 28.6°C); Af RMO round (BFR 25.5°C, DSC 25.5°C) and rectangular (BFR 28.0°C, DSC 25.9°C). Significant differences were observed between the manufacturer-listed transformation temperatures and those obtained with BFR and DSC testing for both manufacturers. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest that the Bend and Free Recovery method is suitable as a standard method to evaluate the transformation temperatures of heat-activated Ni-Ti orthodontic archwires.

Accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index measurements.

INTRODUCTION: A digital analysis that is shown to be accurate will ease the demonstration of initial case complexity. To date, no literature exists on the accuracy of the digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index (DI) calculations when applied to pretreatment digital models. METHODS: Plaster models were obtained from 45 previous patients with varying degrees of malocclusion. Total DI scores and the target disorders were computed manually with a periodontal probe on the original plaster casts (gold standard) and digitally using Ortho Insight 3D (Motion View Software, Hixson, Tenn) and OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ). Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were assessed for 15 subjects using the Spearman rho correlation test. Accuracies of the DI scores and target disorders were assessed for all 45 subjects using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. RESULTS: Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were high for total DI scores and most target disorders (r > 0.8). No significant difference was found between total DI score when measured with OrthoCAD compared with manual calculations. The total DI scores calculated by Ortho Insight 3D were found to be significantly greater than those by manual calculation by 2.71 points. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that a DI calculated by Ortho Insight 3D may lead the clinician to overestimate case complexity. OrthoCAD's DI module was demonstrated to be a clinically acceptable alternative to manual calculation of the total scores.